• Dare reached a similar conclusion about Silverlight and Apollo that I did. But newly minted Adobe RIA evangelist Ryan Stewart writes that calling Silverlight vs. Apollo the next platform competition is overblown. However, he then reiterates my point that MSFT is moving in on Adobe’s traditional stronghold (aka the web) while Adobe is moving in on MSFT’s traditional stronghold (aka the desktop). The upshot is that both companies are trying to deliver a unified “client” platform that spans desktop, devices and browser. That sounds like “platform competition” to me.
• Apparently I’m missing the this years compiler dev lab. 😦 John Lam is there, with slides from his talk on the DLR. Miguel de Icaza is there, with fairly extensive notes. Hopefully they will post talks like they did last year.
• Speaking of languages, Scott Hanselman explains why he thinks Ruby is “the tits”. Personally, on the scale between “I can’t see where Ruby is such hot shit” and “Ruby is the tits”, I’m somewhere near the middle, leaning towards tits. I love the expressiveness of Ruby’s syntax, but I miss the static typing. Call me over the hill, but I like the compiler catching mistakes at compile time. I realize it’s not for everyone, but I like what I like.
• This talk about Ruby’s expressiveness reminds me of something Larry O’Brien said in the wake of the IronRuby announcement: “I am surprised by the IronRuby announcement. I really thought we were going to see some form of Ruby#:Ruby::C#:Java. Although I’m happy, I was actually hoping to see a new language.” The expressiveness of Ruby that Scott describes (which is to say, not all of Ruby’s expressiveness) would be completely achievable in a statically typed language. Personally, I’d like to see that language…
• My birthday is past, but I want a Lego Ice Cube Tray. (via Geekdad)

These morning meetings are really cramping the “morning” style of these posts. But better late than never, I guess.

• Politics 2.0 Watch: Democrats pwn Republicans online. (via Balloon Juice)
• Roger Wolter writes about integrating SSB with WF, something I’ve experimented with myself. I didn’t find the integration quite as natural as Roger did – transactions are a real PITA, and Roger apparently he hasn’t looked into that yet - but I agree 100% with the idea that “most SSB programs end up looking a lot like a workflow.” Looking forward to seeing your code, Roger.
• Pat explains his Newton vs. Einstein view of distributed systems and then rants about Consistency, Availability and Partition-tolerance. In particular, he discusses the evolution of what consistency (and to less extent availability) means in the face of loose coupling. Do yourself a favor and give up on distributed transactions now. Also, Pat points to another paper from CIDR dealing with isolation in services. Haven’t read it yet, but I’ve added it to “the pile”.
• David Chappell writes about Service Component Architecture vs. Service Oriented Architecture. Since I don’t “do” evangelism anymore, I don’t spend much time watching what our competitors are doing. According to the SCA website, SCA is supposedly a “a model for building applications and systems using a Service-Oriented Architecture.” But according to David, SCA 1.0 focuses on “portability, not interoperability, and so they don’t fully define the interactions between components necessary to create composites that cross vendor boundaries.” I realize that we don’t industry agreement on all the details of what SOA means, but I think we all agree that it’s cross platform and cross vendor. Or maybe we can’t even agree on that much.

• Saw Shrek the Third over the weekend with the kids. It’s gotten mixed reviews, but I liked it even though it wasn’t as good as the first two. Is it just me, or has sequel-itis reached an all time high? This month alone we’ve had Spiderman 3, 28 Weeks Later, Shrek the Third and the new Pirates movie opens this week.
• Hot on the heels of his post on anonymous types, Scott Guthrie starts to explain LINQ to SQL, which is where all these C#3/VB9 features have been headed. Lots of digital ink have been spilled on this topic since we announced LINQ @ PDC 05, so I’ll just point out that I think this is the first OR/M solution that really works well across the board.
• David Ing sucks the fun out of PopFly by suggesting it might be a “nice data aggregation / reformatting service for technically-challenged managers [and] their business data”. Sounds like the next step of enterprise mashups.
• Speaking of PopFly, Larry O’Brein thinks PopFly is helping restore ” the bridge between power users and programmers”. From the PopFly FAQ: “We’re going back to our roots in 1975 when Microsoft originally launched BASIC for the Altair 8080. Tools like BASIC and Visual Basic 1.0 democratized development by enabling users to easily build applications on DOS and Windows. We believe we can make Popfly a great tool for building and sharing applications on the Web.”
• Scott Hanselman wonders if Microsoft is losing the Alpha Geeks. In a related vein, I wonder if MS should be learning more aggressively from the community. MS has been the source of many developer innovations, but certainly not all. For ideas pioneered elsewhere, we tend to eventually get it, but I think we could be better about it.
• Apparently, I’m just a little younger than video games. Pong was born May of 1967, only three years to the month before me. (via Ozymandias)

No, I’m not referring to this hilarious line from Clerks. It’s my birthday today – can you guess which one?

(note, there’s no real point to this post, except to have “I’m 37!?!” in the title. Let’s just say I’m a big Kevin Smith fan. In case you haven’t see Clerks, most lines from that movie are NSFW. )

Update: David Ing’s son broke his arm over the weekend. That led David to write “If you are away from your family a lot then my advice would be to fix that as quickly as you can.” +1 on that sentiment. I went from field architect evangelist (travel requirement ~50%) to HQ architect evangelist (travel requirement ~10%) when Patrick was born. Of course in MSIT, I almost never travel, something my whole family appreciates. Something to be thankful for as I turn a year older.

• Soma announces PopFly, the “fun, easy way to build and share mashups, gadgets, Web pages, and applications” from the Non-Professional tools team. The PopFly team blog has some videos. Sounds vaguely like Yahoo! Pipes, but cooler. While most of the focus is on their browser-based mashup creator, they also have VS support for the non-non-professionals among us.
• Eric Nelson suggests that the new Dynamics CRM systems is actually a LOB application platform in it’s own right. More details in Ben Riga’s MIX session. (via Gianpaolo)
• Sam Gentile is worried that C# is becoming to complex, especially when you also consider how fast the platform is moving underneath. When you get your head out of the debugger for a second and look at the Big Picture, it certainly seems overwhelming. Is it just a question of getting used to it? The first time I fired up the VS.net 2002 alpha and looked at all the classes in the BCL, I had the same overwhelmed feeling, but eventually I got over it. Or have things just gotten too big and move to fast now? If so, it’s time for some new layers of abstraction…
• Udi Dahan writes about building testable services. Testability has to be a core consideration when building anything, but especially a reusable framework. I’ve had similar thoughts about language design. How do you unit test a DSL?
• Roberto Medrano of SOA Software thinks “maybe 20 percent of IT folks understand SOA and half of the rest think they do”. Personally, I think most IT folks don’t agree on what SOA is or should be. Furthermore, we don’t even have a common lexicon to discuss it, so we end up talking past each other and arguing about topics we agree on. I think Roberto is really saying is “most people are wrong because they don’t agree with what I think SOA is”. (via Jack van Hoof)
• Jeffrey Snover talks about the virtuous cycle of .NET language support. His point is that time spent learning .NET pays off as you transition between system programming (C#, VB.NET), shell programming (PowerShell) and script programming (IronPython, DLR). I’m not sure I would break them down that way, but his point spot on.
• Clemens Vasters experiments with the new BizTalk Services with a sample called TweetieBot. I agree 100% with his point about the assumption of centralization will be challenged by the federation of personal services.