Blog Posts from January 2006 (page 1 of 3)
FYI, for those going to VSLive! in San Francisco, I’m a last minute addition to the schedule. I’m presenting a talk titled Developer 2.0: Finding Your Way in the Future of Software Development. I wrote and delivered this presentation originally for the patterns & practices Summit back in December. It was the second-highest rated talk of the summit (after Anders’ LINQ keynote) so I’m excited to be delivering it again. I’m hoping to get a high-quality recording so I can publish it (I recorded the p&p summit version with my laptop. You can hear it but I wouldn’t say it’s “high quality”). The session is at 5:45pm on Tuesday. I’ve been told it’s in room 2016/2018, but you should double check when you get there if you’re interested in going.
There’s a solid showing from the Architecture Strategy Team at the VSLive! Software Architecture Summit this year. In addition to my last minute addition:
- John deVadoss’s day two keynote on Software Architecture on the Edge: Moving Beyond OA.
- Ron Jacobs on Integration, Service Orientation and Pattern Driven Design .
- John Evdemon on Workflow Enabled Services.
- Mauro Regio on Collaboration Software Factory.
See you in San Fran!
I was just talking to Michael Arrington about some Web 2.0 stuff when I realized I’ve been blogging for three years now. I started blogging three years and two weeks ago. Doesn’t seem that long ago I was sitting in a Phoenix hotel room putting the finishing touches on the blog engine that powered the first version of DevHawk. (I moved over to DasBlog just under a year later.) But in reality, there’s been two kids, a new house, four roles, five managers and a move to campus since I launched my DevHawk Blog. Quite a ride!
Now that I’m an Architect on the Edge (I’m thinking of putting that on my business card. Good idea or bad idea?) of course the first order of business is taking a closer look at “Web 2.0”. One thing leaps out at me right away – I hate the name “Web 2.0”.
First off, it’s a pure marketing buzzword. It was originally coined as a conference name. In a way, the fact that is has no underlying meaning is a good thing, because it gives people argue whether it really exists or not. In a way, it’s like the word “multimedia” back when we were first putting CD-ROMs into computers. There used to be lots of discussion if one thing or another truly was “multimedia”. Now, we don’t really worry about categorizing it as the marketing buzz around the term is long gone.
Secondly, I think it’s wildly arrogant to claim we’re only on version 2.0. The Internet has been around for 36 years. So everything before mid 2004 was Web 1.0 or earlier? And people are already talking about Web 3.0. Come on, let’s get real. The technologies that are driving the current revolution have been percolating for more than one major version of the underlying technology.
Finally, what’s with the version number anyway? One of the core principles Tim O’Reilly outlined was the “End of the Software Release Cycle”. Why are we using a holdover from the software release cycle days to indicate the end of the software release cycle?
Don’t get me wrong, I strongly believe that there is dramatic change happening in this industry. The way I explain my new job is to consider that one of the most basic axioms of distributed computing has been overturned.
From day one, all the computing power has been focused in the center. At first, the machines on the edge had no power at all – they were just dumb terminals. Slowly but surely, those machines at the edge started to become powerful in their own right. However, it’s only in the last seven to ten years that commodity hardware that was pervasive on the edge grew powerful enough to power the center. And it’s only in the last two or three years that the connection between the center and the edge grew fast and pervasive enough to make that edge power relevant.
The rules have changed. The power has shifted from the center to the edge. And we’re only just beginning to see the effects.
Maybe we should call it WebNT? 😄