Passion * Technology * Ruthless Competence

Monday, December 13, 2004

Member Management Component Prototype

How about this for transparency?

The Microsoft ASP.NET v1.1 Membership Management Component Prototype contains classes that allow a developer to more easily authenticate users, authorize users, and store per-user property data in a user profile. The authentication feature validates and stores user credentials which a developer can use to manage user authentication on a web site. The authorization feature lets you treat groups of users as a unit by assigning users to roles such as manager, sales, member, and so on. Combined with ASP.NET's built-in authorization functionality, Windows Shared Hosting developers have end-to-end support for maintaining user-to-role mappings and authorizing users based on this information. The profile feature enables you to provide users of your Web site with a custom experience. By defining and using profile properties, you can track any custom information your application requires, including user information and user preferences.

Important: The functionality provided by this component is a preliminary version of the Membership, Roles, and Profile functionality coming in ASP.NET 2.0 and will change in the final release of ASP.NET 2.0. This means that any ASP.NET v1.1 applications you develop using this component will need to be updated when you migrate to the final release of ASP.NET 2.0. This is also a non Microsoft supported component.

What I love about this the most is that it really reflects a change in mindset. In the past, I doubt we would have shipped this because it is likey to change before release. Personally, I like this approach - ship early and often and be honest about the quality and longevity. Sure, you have to deal with a few people who don't read things like “will change“ or “not supported“ but the benefits outweigh the issues dramatically.

Posted By Harry Pierson at 11:24 AM Pacific Standard Time
Tuesday, December 14, 2004 8:56:52 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
That question is not easy. Who can find a rather good resolution? If you can, tell me please.
Comments are closed.
Change Congress
Recent Bookmarks
Tags .NET Framework (2) __clrtype__ (9) ADO.NET (5) Agile (7) AJAX (3) Architecture (284) Guidance (6) Interop (2) Modelling (61) Patterns (7) Process (4) SOA (93) Web Services (5) ASP.NET (24) Azure (1) Battlestar Galactica (3) BI (2) BizTalk (4) Blogging (117) dasBlog (11) Podcasting (4) BPM (1) C# (11) C++ (4) Capitals (5) CardSpace (3) CLR (2) College Football (10) Comedy Central (1) Community (81) Concurrency (6) Consumer Electronics (1) Database (13) Debugger (18) Dependency Injection (2) Development (119) C Plus Plus (1) Embedded (5) Lanugages (40) Media (2) P2P (11) Rotor (1) SharePoint (6) SOP (3) DIY (1) DLR (19) Domain Specific Languages (15) Durable Messaging (5) Dynamic Languages (10) Dynamic Silverlight (1) Education (3) Enterprise 2.0 (1) Entertainment (14) ETech (15) F# (51) Functional Programming (17) Game Development (2) Guidance Automation (3) Hardware (8) HawkEye (3) Health (1) Hockey (31) Home Electronics (1) Home Network (5) Humor (5) IASA (1) Idempotence (3) infrastructure (5) Instrumentation (4) Integration (2) IronPython (92) IronRuby (13) Java (2) Job (3) Kodu (1) LangNET (2) LINQ (23) Live Framework (3) Live Mesh (2) Lost (1) Master Data Management (1) Media 2.0 (6) Microsoft (31) MIX06 (2) Mobile Phone (1) Monads (5) Morning Coffee (172) Object Oriented (4) Office (5) Open Source (7) Open Space (2) Operations (3) Other (135) Art (1) Books (1) Family (33) Games (18) General Geekery (26) Home Theater (1) Movies (23) Music (20) Politics (3) Society (1) Sports (37) Working at MSFT (17) Parallel Programming (3) Parsing Expression Grammar (16) patterns & practices (2) PDC08 (5) Politics (48) PowerPoint (2) PowerShell (37) Presentation (5) Projects (1) HawkWiki (1) Python (6) Quote of the Day (4) Refactoring (1) Research (2) REST (18) Reuse (5) Robotics (2) Rock Band (4) Rome (5) Ruby (23) Ruby on Rails (1) Sci-Fi (2) Scripting (4) Security (3) Service Broker (14) SharePoint (2) Silverlight (20) Social Software (1) Software + Services (2) Software Design (1) Software Factories (11) Software Industry (1) Spark (1) SQL Server (2) Stephen Colbert (1) TechEd (7) TechEd06 (1) TechRec League (1) Television (6) Travel (6) Unified Client (1) Unit Testing (4) USC (1) UX (1) Virtual PC (2) Visual Basic (2) Visual Studio (20) Volta (2) Washington Capitals (37) WCF (31) Web 2.0 (65) Web Services (5) WF (21) Windows (1) Windows Live (28) Windows Live Writer (2) WPF (7) Xbox (1) Xbox 360 (54) XML (11) XNA (15) Zune (4)
Disclaimer: The information in this weblog is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. This weblog does not represent the thoughts, intentions, plans or strategies of my employer. It is solely my opinion. Inappropriate comments will be deleted at the authors discretion.