Passion * Technology * Ruthless Competence

Thursday, May 27, 2004

TechEd Days 2 & 3

After the first two days left me in a daze, I've been taking it as easy as I can. Most of my time during the day has been spent in the cabaña where the couches are very comfy. Of course, time in the cabaña isn't exactly "taking it easy" - we may have less traffic than the Dev and Office cabañas on either side, but there are still lots of attendees to sit down and chat about architecture with. I've had several fascinating discussions about SOAP-enabling building control systems (HVAC, Access control, lighting, etc) with the chair of the Open Building Information Exchange (oBIX) OASIS Technical Committee.

Tuesday night was laid back - dinner @ the hotel pub and a relatively early night. Last night I went to the Office party @ the Hard Rock Cafe. There were a bunch of guys who had come to the Road Rally on Sunday so we hung out for quite a while drinking and talking architecture. Tonight is the big attendee party @ Sea World. I assume it will be much like the attendee party @ PDC - mostly drinking beer and talking w/ other attendees.

My final presentation is in 45 minutes as I type this - Data in Service Oriented Architecture. So far, my scores for the sessions I did Monday are pretty good. The Metropolis overview scored ~7.6 out of 9 and the Metropolis Discussion a ~6.8. These keep changing since the eval systems stay open until the end of the conference. Given the craziness with the last-minute speaker change, I'm OK with those scores. They give us access to all the anonymous raw scores and comments which is great for improving my performance in later sessions. For example, apparently I spoke too fast on Monday (hey, I was nervous!) so I'll be specifically working on that today.

Of course, you can't keep everyone happy all the time. A few members commented that they didn't like the Metropolis analogy. Apparently, someone who didn't like the Metropolis Overview also showed up for the Metropolis Discussion, still didn't like it and commented we should "get off" the analogy. Why you would show up for the discussion if you didn't like the overview? I've also seen several comments that the Architecture track has no code. Not sure how to address that since the lack of code is by design! Of course, such growing pains are to be expected for our first time at TechEd.

Posted By Harry Pierson at 2:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Comments are closed.
Change Congress
Recent Bookmarks
Tags .NET Framework (2) __clrtype__ (9) ADO.NET (5) Agile (7) AJAX (3) Architecture (288) Guidance (6) Interop (2) Modelling (61) Patterns (7) Process (4) SOA (94) Web Services (5) ASP.NET (25) Async Messaging (2) Azure (1) Battlestar Galactica (3) BI (2) BizTalk (4) Blogging (117) dasBlog (11) Podcasting (4) BPM (1) C# (11) C++ (4) Capitals (5) CardSpace (3) CLR (2) CodePlex (1) College Football (10) Comedy Central (1) Community (81) Concurrency (6) Consumer Electronics (1) Database (13) Debugger (23) Dependency Injection (2) Development (122) C Plus Plus (1) Embedded (5) Lanugages (42) Media (2) P2P (11) Rotor (1) SharePoint (6) SOP (3) DIY (1) DLR (25) Domain Specific Languages (15) Durable Messaging (5) Dynamic Languages (12) Dynamic Silverlight (1) Education (3) Enterprise 2.0 (1) Entertainment (14) ETech (15) F# (51) Functional Programming (17) Game Development (2) Guidance Automation (3) Hardware (8) HawkCodeBox (1) HawkEye (3) Health (1) Hockey (31) Home Electronics (1) Home Network (5) Hosting API (1) Humor (5) IASA (1) Idempotence (3) infrastructure (5) Instrumentation (4) Integration (2) IronPython (112) IronRuby (16) Java (2) Job (3) Kodu (1) LangNET (2) Lightweight Debugger (5) LINQ (23) Live Framework (3) Live Mesh (2) Lost (1) Master Data Management (1) Media 2.0 (6) Microsoft (31) MIX06 (2) Mobile Phone (1) Monads (5) Morning Coffee (172) Object Oriented (4) Office (5) Open Source (8) Open Space (2) Operations (3) Other (135) Art (1) Books (1) Family (33) Games (18) General Geekery (27) Home Theater (1) Movies (23) Music (20) Politics (3) Society (1) Sports (37) Working at MSFT (19) Parallel Programming (3) Parsing Expression Grammar (16) patterns & practices (2) PDC08 (5) Politics (48) Polyglot (3) PowerPoint (2) PowerShell (39) Presentation (7) Projects (1) HawkWiki (1) Pygments (5) Python (6) Quote of the Day (4) Refactoring (1) Research (2) REST (18) Reuse (5) Robotics (2) Rock Band (4) Rome (5) Ruby (23) Ruby on Rails (1) Sci-Fi (2) Scripting (4) Security (3) Service Broker (14) SharePoint (2) Silverlight (20) Social Software (1) Software + Services (2) Software Design (2) Software Engineering (1) Software Factories (11) Software Industry (1) Space Elevator (1) Spark (1) SQL Server (2) Stephen Colbert (1) TechEd (7) TechEd06 (1) TechRec League (1) Television (6) Travel (7) Unified Client (1) Unit Testing (4) USC (1) UX (1) Virtual PC (2) Visual Basic (3) Visual Studio (20) Volta (2) Washington Capitals (37) WCF (31) Web 2.0 (67) Web Services (7) WF (21) Windows (3) Windows Live (29) Windows Live Writer (3) WPF (8) Xbox (1) Xbox 360 (54) XML (11) XNA (15) Zune (4)
Disclaimer: The information in this weblog is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. This weblog does not represent the thoughts, intentions, plans or strategies of my employer. It is solely my opinion. Inappropriate comments will be deleted at the authors discretion.